Search This Blog

Happy Children

Happy Children
Children at Dhapo Colony Slum

Monday, May 09, 2022

Reopening of School- Post COVID-19

 

 

Background 

With the COVID-19 pandemic leading to prolonged school closures, children were deprived not only of learning, but also of mid-day meals, social protection and psycho-social support. Girls, children from the most disadvantaged households and children with disabilities faced the biggest challenge. Some state governments took initiative to open the schools but had to close them again due to surge in infections in the subsequent COVID waves. It remains unclear whether, and to what extent, schools were able to follow guidelines for safe school reopening.

 

National and state governments implemented various initiatives aimed at continuity of education, including the use of media, e-platforms and web platforms. However, unequal access to the internet increased the disparity among learners as ~51% of India’s population is not connected to the internet (Devara 2020). Online studies were irregular with parents wanting schools to reopen (The School Team, 2021) as more than learning loss, school closures meant loss of nutrition, mental and psychological well-being and safety (India Task Force 2021). With schools now reopening and Learning Recovery being emphasized by the government of India (including initial budgetary provision made), the country has a mammoth task ahead to cover lost ground.

A Glimpse Into the Impact of Covid-19 on Children’s Education, Health and Wellbeing

The impact of school and anganwadi closures and budget cuts was particularly severe for the most marginalised groups. It aggravated the existing disadvantages of gender, caste and class further by restricting their mobility, access to resources and agency.

Impact on Education

‘Mission Recovering Education’ report shows that the learning poverty in low and middle income countries estimated at 53% before the pandemic is likely to rise to 70% due to school closures and the ineffectiveness of remote learning (UNICEF, UNESCO & World Bank, 2021). It also suggests that the crisis has exacerbated inequities in education as,

       children from low-income households, children with disabilities and girls were less likely to access to remote learning than their peers due to lack of accessible technologies, availability of electricity, connectivity, devices as well as discrimination

       younger children, especially pre-school children, had less access to remote learning and were more affected be learning loss  

       girls experienced larger loss due to loss of protection that schools and learning offers to their well-being and life chances (ibid). 

 

Studies conducted in India show that rapid assessment of interventions that supported distance, home-based schooling for the most marginalised backgrounds found access to be limited and of low quality. For instance, it was seen that,

·        Over 80% children in public schools did not received textbooks for AY 2020-21 (Oxfam 2020). Of the 60% sample students who accessed any remote learning resources, 80% reported they were learning less than in school (The School Team 2021).

·        92% of children on average lost at least one specific language ability and 82% lost one specific maths ability from the previous year across all classes. This learning loss will not only hamper engagement with more complex abilities but also cause disengagement with studies, school and peers impacting potential drop-out rates (APU 2021).

·        Teachers limited capacity to facilitate online classes and meaningful assessment, did not find useful online resources for teaching, could not maintain emotional connection with their learners and reported that their students could not complete assignments during online classes (APU 2020, Singh et.al. 2020).

·        59% of parents in private schools and 80% in public schools reported that education was not delivered during lockdown. 81% parents faced challenges to support their children to access digital education (Oxfam 2020). Citing their dissatisfaction, an overwhelming 90% of parents surveyed were willing to send their children to school with necessary health and safety precautions (APU 2020).

Impact on Health and Well-being 

During lockdown, 51% of parents with children below 5 years of age could access immunisation services (CRY 2020). 83% urban and 73% rural households reported consuming less food than before (APU 2020) with parents confirming alterations in eating pattern of their children (CRY 2020) affecting their nutritional status and overall development and leaving them agitated and anxious (ibid).

 

The entitlements provided through schools were severely affected too, with disruptions in supplementary nutrition programme (SNP) under Anganwadi Services and mid-day meal (MDM) due to discontinuity, receipt of dry rations or direct bank transfer (DBT) in lieu of MDM (Ambast 2021; Oxfam 2020).

 

Places where dry rations were provided in lieu of the MDM and SNP fell short of the required nutritious and micronutrient-rich food (Acharya 2020). Experts predict that disruption in provisioning could increase malnutrition in India by 10-20% and an additional 6000 children could die every day due to disruption in health services (Awasthi 2020).

 

Children were locked up in homes during school closures. ChildLine reported receiving 92,000 calls reporting abuse and violence, with one-third of this number reported during the first 11 days of the lockdown. According to data reported by ChildLine, a nodal agency of the Union Ministry of Women and Child Development protecting children in distress, out of 92,203 interventions, some 5,584 during the lockdown (35 percent) were related to child marriages. Of this number, 97 percent were minors (18 years and below) and 91 percent were girls. Children’s mental well-being was affected to a large extent.

 

This period also saw a large number of drop-outs as parents could not afford fees, did not have the infrastructure to support online schooling or children were employed in domestic chores or in informal labour (ग्रामवाणी फ़ीचर्ज़ 12 July 2021).

Vulnerable Children

The children with disabilities, children in remote locations, tribal and migrant children and children in street situations were worst hit. Children with disability are most dependent on face-to-face services for health, education and protection. These services were severely hit during the lockdown and subsequent social distancing measures. They were the least to gain from online teaching-learning (UN 2020). Children in remote locations and tribal areas were cut off from digital learning due to lack of devices and connectivity (Sharma Sept. 8 2020). Migrant children witnessed the loss of income and livelihoods of their parents, food shortage and insecurity and discontinued schooling for long periods without access to online education (Iftikhar 20 Jan 2022). For those in the street situation, reports documented systemic failure to keep a track of data on their condition, inadequate services to provide for their nutrition and rehabilitation due to loss of families during the pandemic making the National Council for Protection of Child Rights revise its guideline to focus on child as a unit of the family rather than without (Majumdar Jan 2022).

COVID/Emergency Responses

With the idea of school as a stable enterprise disrupted, the central government addressed learning by reducing syllabus, offering online and digital resources including TV and radio programmes (MHRD July 2021). To address psycho-social issues life skills programme ‘Manodarpan’ offering a toll-free helpline number, a website and a handbook on life-skills necessary to survive a health crisis were started. Psycho-social support centres, ‘Snehi’ were set up in different parts of India where counsellors helped children and adolescents address their mental health issues (GoI 2021).

 

States, too, implemented their own measures. For instance, the Uttar Pradesh Education Department opened the upper primary schools first followed by primary schools. The DEOs, BEOs and teachers were given guidelines on security, safety and sanitization for school reopening. They called parents to school to assure the safety of their children.

 

The state is in the process of combining and/or reducing learning outcomes expected of children in these classes for setting ‘realistic expectations’.  Such interventions can be problematic as ‘realistic expectations’ could mean lowering expectations. Many states delivered workbooks (made by external agencies) to children to ensure learning continuity and in some states, teachers collected data on completion of these workbooks!   

 

The teachers, on their own accord, connected with the community to offer them spaces for learning to ensure continuity of engagement with learning.

 

Many states provided dry ration in place of hot cooked meals. Hot-cooked meals were provided in Odisha and Chhattisgarh through self-help groups and Tamil Nadu instituted a robust system of provisioning and monitoring of dry rations at doorstep. A representation of categories of mid-day meals provided by all states and UTs is given,

 

Index

1

Dry Ration

2

Hot Cooked Meal

3

Additional items from State Resources

 

As far as children with disability are concerned, most states (Punjab being an exception) did not issue any notification. The children, due to school closure, lost out on therapeutic classes, sign language classes or any effort for social interaction that is critical to maintain their well-being. “We might lose what we have done in the last 30-40 years for CWSN,” says Tulika Das of AROD (RTE Forum 2021).

 

The challenge is that the long-standing demands for basic needs like health, nutrition, social security as well as enrolment and continuity of schooling still remain. In fact, these have become even more acute during the pandemic. There is also a deepening crisis of community action as state structures to support these are few.

 

Notable state interventions include anganwadi services open during the pandemic in Delhi, tracking of COVID by state disaster management authority in Andhra Pradesh (Urs 2020), running of community kitchens at each Panchayat in Kerala (MSC May 2020), enhanced service coverage and improved coordination between ICDS and state health programmes in Odisha, enrolment of migrant workers in anganwadi centres to provide nutritious food from state/flexi funds in Bihar (Suri and Kapur 2020), ensuring doorstep delivery of supplementary nutrition and also assisting parents in undertaking creative learning activities with their children at home in Gujarat (GoI 2020).

 

There was however, a huge gap in providing support, services and policy actions for children under 6 years, likely to affect a generation of children who will have a disadvantaged start in early years due to disruption in basic support (The Indian Express 6 May 2021; UNICEF March 2021).       

Key Areas Discussed

With the pandemic rolling back much of the progress made in education, climatic changes have added to the uncertainty of school reopening to its pre-pandemic state. This has aggravated the situation for the disadvantaged. The component of provisioning through one’s own pocket has increased (UNESCO 2020), while the long-standing demands for basic needs like health, nutrition, social security as well as enrolment and continuity of schooling have become very acute.

 

A strategic plan to enable continuity of schooling, including social security to all children, is needed both at the centre and state levels. As a potential input towards the development of such a plan, the RTE Forum held three consultation with experts and members of grassroots organisations under the themes given, 

1.     Safe reopening of schools focusing on marginalised children 

2.     Learning deprivation, teacher development and pedagogy 

3.     Role of governance in reopening schools  

 

The objective of these consultations was to understand the process of school closures and measures taken by the centre and the states to address the emergency; the levels at which decision making was done to address school closures, reopening; and schooling and provision of social security to children. In addition, experts pointed out steps that the government could take to ensure social security and learning of children as schools reopen, and for emergencies in the future.

 

This policy brief lays out recommendations towards the plan for the nation and states for children post school reopening. For doing so, it considers three crucial areas of,

Quality of Education including:

       Addressing learning gaps

       Addressing psycho-social and emotional needs

       Teacher preparation

       Suggestions for appropriate use of technology

       Preparedness for future school disruptions

Equity covering:

       Adaptations to involve girls, Dalits, adivasis, minorities, migrants, children with disabilities and other marginalised communities

       School as a site of provision of social protection and entitlements during the course of the pandemic

       Supporting return of children – identification and mapping, addressing needs of children who are part of child labour or experiencing social protection needs

and Governance to ensure:  

       System preparedness

       Decentralised decision making

       Enhancing Accountability

       Financing the recovery – resources needed for a comprehensive response

 

Where appropriate, the recommendations within each of the above are accompanied by suggested implementation steps that may be incorporated within AWPBs or Learning Recovery Plans being developed by states.

School Reopening and the Continuity of Schooling

A strategic action plan to reassert the right to education for every child will take cognisance of critical issues , including:

       How can schools prepare for a more complex process of admissions and enrolments?

       How can they address the needs of a much larger number of children than before (due to the shift from private schools that have closed)?

       Will teachers focus on cognitive learning alone or address emotional and psycho-social learning? How will teachers look at children’s relationship with each other as they have cut off from each other too?

       Will teachers resort to the use of online teaching, hybrid teaching?

       How will the teachers and schools be supported?

 

During the shift from ‘offline to online’, teachers were provided readymade worksheets and blueprints of lesson plans to be relayed to the children. Teachers, however, look at children as belonging to diverse contexts, and feel they need to ‘adapt the curriculum’ to the cultural and social milieu of children, as well as their aspirations and the opportunities they need (Batra et. al. 2021). Thus, shifting from a one-size-fits-all to ‘to each according to their need’ is a challenge in itself.

This section presents the steps that can be taken to address the challenges faced. These steps have been categorised under quality, equity and governance strategies. The more specific ‘action plans’ at systemic and civil society levels are elaborated in the next section titled ‘Implementation’. 

Recommendations

Quality

School is a space for children – it is as much a space for equity, justice and democracy as it is for learning. It offers care and protection and acts as the site of delivery of  various  social security schemes, including for school health and MDM, which contribute to children’s overall health and development. Recent evidence shows that food security reduces stunting and intergenerational impact of malnutrition making it an important contributor to children’s development. The following steps are recommended towards improvement in the quality of schooling.

Addressing Learning Gaps (Holistically)

In the Immediate Term
Recommendation
Implementation Steps

As the schools reopen, psycho-social support should be made an integral part to make an effective learning environment.

 
·        Constitute a state level advisory group drawn from professionals from relevant groups.
·        Constitute an experts group to develop modules and other resources needed at school as well as cluster, block, district and state levels. 
·        Based on inputs of advisory group, expert team may orient state, district and sub-district level resource persons to deliver the required inputs to teachers, Head Teachers, SMCs and others relevant. The state monitoring system may monitor psycho-social support being provided to students and suggest course correction as needed.  

Content specific pedagogy to enable Learning Recovery may be planned, with teachers acting as a resource for planning and delivering this content in partnership with children and community.

 
Key inputs needed
·        Help teachers identify critical prerequisites for each grade (the intention is not to do a full-fledged bridge programme but bring each child to grade level learning as quickly as possible).
·        Evolve a pedagogy whereby teachers can easily work with groups of children at multiple levels.
·        Use an indexing system to enable teachers to identify resources from existing materials already available. Create only minimum required material.     

Where the pandemic has not subsided fully, address the timings of institutions, in particular anganwadis. These might need extension of hours and staggering of shifts, say, 2-3 shifts from 9 am to 5 pm, with fewer children in each group.

 

 

·        A state level committee may be established and initiate a rapid situational analysis in this regard, followed by decisions made by authorities.
·        Since this will require additional work for existing cadres, they will need to be financially compensated, a key consideration for the state level committee. Currently AWWs are employed for 4-5 hours but work longer.
·        District level authorities may be empowered to take decisions on timings. In addition, other issues such as who will pick up children of working parents, will need to be worked out through localised efforts.
Wherever teachers took the initiative to run learning centres, the connect with parents, teachers, block and district officials – should continue as this would provide an effective learning environment for children, support assessment of student learning and recover learning loss with use of appropriate resources.
·        The role of SMCs may be strengthened through the creation of Volunteer School Support Groups anchored by the SMCs wherever such cooperation is available.
·        A generic Terms of Reference for such Volunteer School Support Groups may be created.
·        NGOs may be involved in developing orientation programmes for such groups to help them be effective.
·        Sharing of success stories in this regard will help generate motivation and create a supportive environment.
·        However, it is important that this remain a voluntary rather than mandated activity.

Given the evolving nature of the pandemic (and the post-pandemic period, including climate events) an online repository of resources, relevant research studies in education, policy trackers – can provide a snapshot across the country along with information on school closure and reopening. This can assist the national and state governments to monitor situation and plan systematic action.

·        Various organisations have come together under coalitions / networks to create such resources – and these can be readily drawn upon as well as extended, and the links provided to implementers at different levels.

 
For the Long Term 

Recommendation

Implementation Steps

Learning Recovery is unlikely to be a short term ‘remedial’ project and will need a longer term perspective over the next few years. Till such time as the new National and State Curriculum Frameworks and their related textbooks are in place, it will help to redesign the syllabi, making teachers an integral part of the process to strengthen it. 

·        ‘Bridge’ courses or ‘concentrated’ courses essentially try to squeeze expected learning into less time – this is often difficult for teachers as all inputs, whether critical or peripheral receive the same amount of time. It would be more helpful to identify key pre-requisites for each level and concentrate on ensuring that those are attained.

·        Teachers will need inputs on handling an increasingly diverse level of students, and the earlier work done in India on MGML (Multi-grade, Multi-level) pedagogy would be of use here.

·        States are already in the process of adapting their syllabi towards learning recovery. Organising a few national / regional interactions will enable cross-learning and increase the pace of implementation.

The assessment system should be made inclusive for children with disabilities as they would need specific interventions to make up for the lost learning time at school during the pandemic. 

·        Task Forces to Address the Needs of Children with Disabilities could be established at state and district levels to assess, plan and implement steps.

·        In particular, the ongoing assessment processes need to be adapted to seek children with disabilities and identify their needs.

 

Health and Nutrition Requirements

The last two years have made the interconnections between learning, nutrition and health even more apparent, with children having suffered on all counts. Given that further waves cannot be ruled out, it is critical to put in place mechanisms to address the issues involved.
In the Immediate Term
Recommendation
Implementation Steps
Schools may be seen as the ‘first to reopen and last to close’.
·        A ‘protocol document’ on school closure and reopening may be created, offering clear guidance authorities at different levels on the kinds of actions to undertake given the varying situations they may encounter.

This being a phasic virus, it is necessary to identify and disseminate the signs on the basis of which decisions regarding school closure may be taken at various levels (including school / cluster / block / district), including any processes of obtaining permission from requisite authorities. 

·        A Expert Group drawn from medical professionals, educationists, CSOs and administrators could be created at the state level to pool information and experience over the last two years to develop easy-to-follow guidelines in this regard.
·        Once created, decision makers at various levels may need a short orientation.
·        A helpline for decision making authorities may be created, wherein they can consult relevant expert/authorities in case of doubtful situations.

When necessary, COVID protocols must be followed at schools including masks for children over 5 years only, sanitization for surface hygiene and social distancing. More important than surface hygiene is full use of open spaces (Dr. Vandana Prasad). Health schemes and programmes such as the Rashtriya Bal Swasthya Karyakram (RBSK) or the school health scheme that contribute to children’s health, were stalled and may be resumed.

·        The Expert Group mentioned above may provide the basis for continued convergence between Education and Health departments.
·        Apart from guidelines on school closure and reopening, they may also provide suggestions on safe functioning and optimal usage of school spaces.
·        A resumption of the school health services and provisioning may be effected, in case not already done.
·        During the pandemic, the lack of supply of iron-folic acid (IFA) tablets, sanitary napkins, and the stalled implementation of immunisation activities at the anganwadis centres have put children at risk. States may partner with public health officials to prioritise implementation of national plans to intensify reach and make policies to prevent discontinuities in the future.

Dry ration or cash transfer have well known limitations. Ration is often distributed among all family members due to deteriorating food security for households. Young children also need to be fed 4-5 times a day and, with parents going out for work, it is young siblings who feed babies. Therefore, beyond provision of food, spot feeding of hot cooked meals is a critical requirement.

·        While feeding programmes have resumed, an enhancement is called for to enable ‘nutritional recovery’ along with learning recovery.
·        The enhanced role of the AWW supported by the volunteer groups referred to above, may be utilised to ensure spot more frequent spot feeding of young children.
The anganwadi workers were involved in conducting awareness campaigns, surveys, home delivery of supplementary nutrition, quarantine arrangements for returning migrants and arranging for relief measures during the pandemic. Despite being at risk themselves, they had limited or no access to PPE kits, lack of transport arrangements, long distance travel and no functional place of work in addition to being severely underpaid and overburdened as the cadre is understaffed (Sinha et.al. 2021). Anganwadi workers’ demands for better pay, full-time employment and associated benefits (Indian Express Feb 7 2022) needs an immediate and effective response by the State (Indian Express Feb 12 2022) and civil society.

 

For the Long Term
·        NHFS-5 data shows rising communicable diseases and obesity, attributed to high consumption of fortified, processed or junk food. Since dry rations or DBTs do not ensure a nutritious supplement for the child as much as a hot cooked meals, it is recommended that MDM comprise of hot cooked meals with a focus on appropriate nutrition as recommended by experts.
·        Provision and implementation plans for breakfast provisions in NEP 2020 and noon meals at the secondary stage is recommended to enable improvement in health and nutrition status. Present mechanisms to ensure quality and nutrition value may be extended accordingly.
·        Health systems have improved considerably between May 2020 and December 2021, along with an improvement in immunization by ASHA workers. The process used in this regard, along with generating a high degree of community awareness, in Delhi, can become a model for other states.
·        Since the families have lost incomes and employment, there is a need to expand relief work for families for a longer period (about seven months).

 

Addressing Psycho-Social and Emotional Needs

Psycho-social care is required for the children, teachers, Head Teachers and the community. This being an emergency, a pyramidal care model would work best.

In the Immediate Term
Recommendation
Implementation Steps
Creation of a safe, secure and protected environment including measures such as ensuring social distance and sanitisation. In terms of pedagogy it means practising learner centred methods in a fear-free environment of the classroom. Fear triggers such as teacher behaviour, rules, regulations and assessment may require to be addressed, in accordance with the RTE Act, 2009.
·        Many steps have been suggested in this regard earlier.
·        It might help states to develop their version of ‘post-pandemic pedagogy’ drawing upon the holistic, experiential and differential pedagogy recommended in the NEP 2020.
·        The teacher standards under development will need to incorporate classroom process aspects drawing from the mandate to develop a supportive classroom.

 

In the Medium Term

Recommendation

Implementation Steps

Working with trained professionals like teachers, health workers and protection officers working with children to give psychosocial care. Integrate health workers to the school system and teacher training.

·        The school health programme will need to be upgraded with a ‘school mental health’ component.

·        Ongoing orientations of teachers may incorporate the critical dimension of supporting student mental health.

Raise awareness among family and community to facilitate psychosocial care for the children.

·        Ongoing community involvement programmes (including on enrolment and retention), may incorporate elements of psychosocial care.

 
For the Long Term

·        A mechanism for coordination with specialised institutions be developed to identify serious cases and refer them to mental health experts.

 

 

Teacher Preparation

In designing the school processes going forward it will help to document teachers’ / Head Teachers’ / supervisors’ experience of the pandemic – the problems they faced by teachers, how they coped/are coping, what they are resorting to and  what have they learnt during the pandemic. Going ahead, this could form the basis for many of the steps involved in teacher preparation.

In the Immediate Term
Recommendation
Implementation Steps

·        To protect the well-being, health and economic security of teachers and other education personnel, provide them with training of safe reopening and support once schools are open. 

·        Teacher training on ‘post-pandemic’ pedagogy will be critical as teachers are faced with a new diversity in schools with increased enrolments in government schools during the pandemic as a large number of children moved from private to government schools during this time.

·        Teacher trainings must follow a child-centred, constructivist, experiential pedagogy that emphasizes socio-emotional connect and is designed to address differential needs arising in children for the current diversity. 

·        To address children’s needs, the teachers vacancies should be filled with immediate effect and pending salaries and allowances be paid.

·        The NEP 2020’s emphasis on TPD and holistic, experiential pedagogy provides a basis that may be built upon.
·        However, this is not like developing the regular in-service programme and requires – a) rapid school level pilots to evolve models of ‘post pandemic pedagogy’ b) formulation of clear performance standards and indicators c) involving experts from health and psycho-social development domains d) a targeted programme to train the trainers, and e) monitoring both the training and the resultant classroom processes using the standards
·        The AWPB appraisal process may examine state actions on filling approved vacancies and clearance of dues.

 

For the Long Term
The transitions needed are difficult to attain in the short term. Hence, a long-term view, along with an appropriate gestation period, is required in supporting teachers to attain the  various curricular goals connected with learning recovery. One way to enable this is to help teachers articulate personal goals, work towards them, discuss with peers and receive appropriate mentoring inputs. This is currently being worked towards under NEP and will need sustained emphasis to bear fruit.
Recommendation
Implementation Steps

Teachers’ capacities will be strengthened if they have spaces where they can share their experiences and learnings. Hence, setting up teacher collectives could enhance their capability to assert and participate in the process. Teachers’ concerns also need attention and response. 

·        Though the CRCs were set up expressly for this purpose, this has not happened and may now be revived. The school cluster recommended in the NEP may provide a basis towards this. The guidelines being developed for these clusters may go beyond the administrative-financial aspects to supporting the development of teacher collectives as a learning community. With many CSOs already having worked on this, their experience may be tapped.

Enhancing teacher professional capabilities in terms of perspective and skilling is likely to generate better returns if their agency is foregrounded. Since local decision-making will continue to be needed, envisioning them as problem solvers and changemakers at their level is crucial.

·        It is critical to discontinue the present practice of academic plans being given to teachers from state/district level. A far more effective process would be for teacher collectives to develop their term-wise teaching plans, ask for inputs to implement them, and then be monitored by CRC-BRC against the targets they themselves have set.

 

Suggestions of Appropriate use of Technology

The gap in digital access is an important concern so is the quality of digital instruction itself as pointed out in the section ‘impact on education’. It is recognised that younger children’s reading is hampered by use of digital devices (Wolf 2018) therefore a face-to-face instruction is imperative. Technology to support teaching-learning needs tremendous overhaul. Instead, technology can be used as a platform for coordination and support at various levels as recommended.    

In the Immediate Term
·        Prioritise getting all children back to school and anganwadis for complete or partial in-person instruction. Digital education and remote learning cannot replace regular face-to-face instruction.  
·        Tech can be utilised to support children’s participation through social awareness inputs for parents – e.g. data on vaccine efficacy or how children are not affected by viruses. This can ensure confidence in parents to send children to school. 
·        Digital mediums can be used to make inclusive content. For example, interpretation and sub-titles required for the hearing impaired.
·        For pre-primary education and anganwadi education, technology is not appropriate. However, in situation where no other option is available,  blended learning models need to be evolved keeping in mind children’s developmental needs and contexts.
·        The present structural gaps in coordination between Ministries of Education and Women and Child Development should be bridged for evolving a blended curriculum.
·        In addition to a blended curriculum, its manifestation through an effective pedagogy, including  voice-based and physical activities, through phone or WhatsApp calls, along with a trained support adult  such as a      Shikshamitra should be planned. Since a completely online approach will not work, even with blended learning in use, staggered shift of 1.5-2 hours would need to be arranged physically.

 

For the Long-term 
·        Technology should be used in meaningful ways to address psychosocial needs of children like providing counselling support and reaching out to children who lack parental support.              

 

     Equity

While equity issues presented a challenge before the pandemic, the situation has been exacerbated in the last two years, with many marginalised groups now well below the levels they were earlier. Migration and the neglect of needs of many groups, in particular children with disability, have created urgent areas to be addressed. A range of adaptations is required to ensure the inclusion of girls, Dalits, adivasis, minorities, migrants, children with disabilities and other marginalised communities. Running through the different aspects involved are the following two cross-cutting recommendations:

·        A systematic assessment of the situation of underprivileged classes, tribal areas, migrant population, children with disabilities and traditionally deprived groups at the national, state and district level will help identify the impact of the disruption of the education system and to identify out of school children.
·        Surveys revealed that  gender based violence was aggravated during the lockdown, with girls reporting increased violence, harassment and abuse, along with restricted movement. While this was present before the pandemic too, it is now crucial to ensure mobility and restore the voice of girls within school spaces. Many of the recommendations and suggested steps below will enable this.

 

Supporting return of children – identification and mapping, addressing needs of children who are part of child labour or experiencing social protection needs

The enrolment in government schools has increased during the pandemic. Children leaving low-fee private schools and their families migrating back to their villages have contributed to this increase. An understanding of this increase is required as it is likely causing changes in Teacher-Pupil Ratio and needs to be considered when allocating funds for various schemes. In addition, an understanding of the situation on ground will assist in planning teaching-learning, infrastructure needs, enrolment and continuity of schooling. This need analysis can be planned for.

In the Immediate Term
Many of the following may be incorporated into AWPBs and Learning Recovery Plans.
·        Re-open schools that have been closed/merged/rationalized during previous years to enable delivery of small group instruction respecting social distancing and stop further closures.          
·        A verification of attendance registers for the last 3-4 months will be helpful for checking regularity of children attending school as well as in bringing them back to school. In addition, an absence of 5 continuous days should be taken seriously to prevent drop-out. Local groups like SMCs, gram panchayats and volunteers can be involved in this process.          
·        A notification to schools to stop them from asking Transfer Certificates from parents who are admitting children to government school in line with the existing provisions of the RTE Act. This is required as private schools in many states are reluctant to provide the same, blocking children’s access to education.                             
·        It will be crucial to identify and enhance the infrastructure of schools such as separate toilets for girls and boys, taps in running condition, and so on to ensure adequacy for increased enrolment. The government may offer free bus passes to children to prevent drop-out.            
·        An early identification of increase in enrolment can be addressed by enhancing the capacity of existing residential schools e.g., Kasturba Gandhi Balika Vidyalayas and ashramshalas.         

 

 

Governance

The pandemic placed numerous governance challenges and brought out areas that need to be strengthened to deal with the effects as well as towards long-term preparedness. Certain governance lacunae, too, were detrimental to providing support to children, such as the ineffective tracking of street children, considering child as independent of the family unit, and measures like  keeping children separated from their sick families. For the future exigencies, it is recommended that WCD and SCPCR partner with local NGOs, SHGs and panchayats for planning and implementation of response mechanisms.

 

System Preparedness

In the Immediate term

Recommendation
Implementation Steps
Mapping of children in vulnerable circumstances and policy interventions for their rehabilitation and support.
·        Child mapping / Village Education Registers / Door-to-door surveys have been conducted several times by education departments earlier – and the same can provide the basis for a mapping of children in vulnerable affected by the pandemic.
·        The data may be publicly shared to obtain feedback, suggestions and support in developing appropriate responses on an ongoing basis.
A systematic assessment of schools should be undertaken including analysis of the infrastructure, teacher vacancies (specifically female teachers), and school grants to identify overall school needs in the changed context and to pinpoint instances where existing grants have either not been issued or utilised.
·        As above, various forms of school accreditation processes have been underway – and the same may now be tweaked to yield information needed in the present context.
·        To the extent it is feasible, U-DISE may incorporate required data to aid in de-centralised decision-making and response.

 

For the Long Term

·        Develop a long term policy on Education in Emergencies to ensure readiness for future crises.                       

 

Decentralised Decision Making

In the Immediate Term
·        In the pandemic context, school reopening and closure decisions need to be decentralised at the District level. There are examples during the pandemic like in Odisha where the gram panchayat head was given powers as a collector to decide school opening and closure. This can prevent school closure where not required.                                                 
Steps in this regard have been suggested earlier in the document.

 

In the Long Term 
Recommendation
Implementation Steps
A lateral sharing among blocks and clusters will be critical rather than only vertical sharing.
As in the case of teacher collectives and peer learning, similar platforms for sharing among clusters and blocks may be created. States do have block and districts level meetings, which can be adapted for the purpose of cross-learning.

 

     Enhancing[1] [SS2]  Accountability 

While there is synergy between the MoE and MWCD at the national and state levels, the same  needs to be institutionalized at the district level with district collectors and district officers. These synergy mechanisms should also involve CSOs as such organizations will have the most useful insights, access and technical expertise. The national/state level may undertake benchmarking and guideline setting. (Sumitra Mishra)

In the Immediate Term
·        Opening of bank accounts needs to be made easier as the bank accounts of the children are being opened with great difficulty – long lines, documents etc. This is also preventing giving entitlements to children whose accounts are not opened.                                  

·        At present, communication on joining back school tends to be sent out in a general manner – it may not reach out to all or contain clarifications needed by different groups of parents. For instance, parents of very young children or children with disabilities may need specific information on reopening, duration, attendance, precautions, support available, etc.

 

For the Long Term 
·        A social audit of schools relevant to the pandemic situation will assist in making schools responsive to children. The MHRD had a national level meeting for starting national level social-audits.    
·        A simple and easy to use National Index of Educational Needs Responsiveness may be created to rate the degree, timeliness and effectiveness of states responding to the needs of children in pandemic and post-pandemic periods. This will help to demonstrate the process capabilities at different districts, blocks, states and help states know when they are doing a good job).  

 

Financing the recovery – resources needed for a comprehensive response    

Studies show that education budgets were slashed by 65% in low and middle income countries as compared to 33% high and upper-middle income countries doing so (NDTV 2021). The IndiaSpend report shows that twelve Indian states reduced share of education in their budgets and nineteen states are estimated to have spent less than what they proposed in financial year 2020-2021 (Satpute, Scroll 21 Feb 22).

In the Immediate Term
Recommendation
Implementation Steps
Social security for all children should be ensured as schools reopen.
This requires building on many of the steps suggested earlier to enhance in-class and in-school processes, teacher capacitation, community involvement and strengthening governance to address social security aspects.

An analysis of the allocated budget and specific planning for addressing areas where allocations are required is needed along with an increase in the budget.
A financial study may be commissioned in this regard.

 

In the Medium Term

·        It may be worth considering to keep the Midday meal structure separate from the education structure. For instance, Bihar is looking at keeping a separate MDM structure so nutrition can be segregated from the schooling activities. This needs financial allocation and budget. 

·        At present there are many villages where teachers are unable to stay due to lack of accommodation. Financial allocation will be required to enable teachers to stay in the same village as their school.

 
For the Long-term 

·        An analysis of the economic cost of closing schools compared to keeping them open may be undertaken [income-expenditure on health, security] as it is highly likely that the cost of school closure is much higher in the long run since it affects health of the population, income of the economy and HDI of the country.

·        Given the policy aim (including in NEP 2020) to attain the target of 6% of GDP expenditure on education (compared to the current 3.5%) to meet SDG 4 (Rai and Sharma 2017), Government should aim for progressive taxation. In addition, proposals from various economists for attaining this targed (including Prof. Prabhat Patnnaik) may be considered. Various economists have also proposed ways of sourcing funding for education such that it enables the attainment of SGD goals of the country. 

 

 

Conclusion 

Extended school closures during the pandemic had unprecedented effects on learning as well as psychosocial wellbeing of the children. These also caused disruption of access to welfare schemes that form the mainstay for vulnerable groups. National and state governments implemented various initiatives aimed at continuity of education, including the use of media, e-platforms and web platforms. As schools reopened, the National Achievement Survey was conducted to analyse health status and learning gaps of the education system to prepare a focused strategy and reimagine teaching-learning in the present context of increased classroom diversity. In addition, welfare schemes resumed and recognition of children falling out of ambit of the schemes due to lack of documents, bank accounts, migration etc. began. Based on the Learning Recovery Plan (including initial budgetary provisions) Central and State governments intend to develop long term plans for each systemic level to cover lost ground. This document provides inputs towards effective ways of addressing the needs of vulnerable groups, in the immediate, medium and long terms.

 

At the school level, the teachers' own health and wellbeing, teacher training and use of multiple resources and methods for a diverse classroom with children at multiple levels of learning have to be addressed. The school-SMC/community partnerships during the pandemic need strengthening to ensure learning continuity. Support of the CRC, BRC, district and state levels have to be reimagined for teacher capacity building and support to address the academic issues faced, training for psychosocial support and creating a conducive learning environment.   

 

The state system has initiated strategic action plans for learning recovery. It has planned for ensuring access to schooling for the children including below 6 years, streamlining welfare and health schemes at the school and community levels but will require support in capacity building, ongoing implementation in district and sub-district levels as well as monitoring. Partnerships with the civil society organisations in these areas can be that critical support in attaining a deeper and long-term impact. 

 

References

·        Azevedo, Joao Pedro Wagner De; Rogers, F. Halsey; Ahlgren, Sanna Ellinore; Cloutier, Marie-Helene; Chakroun, Borhene; Chang, Gwang-Chol; Mizunoya, Suguru; Reuge, Nicolas Jean; Brossard, Matt; Bergmann, Jessica Lynn, 2021. The State of the Global Education Crisis: a path to recovery. Washington, D.C.: UNESCO, UNICEF and World Bank Group. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/416991638768297704/The-State-of-the-Global-Education-Crisis-A-Path-to-Recovery

·        ET Bureau. 02 Feb 2021. Budget 2021: 6% cut in allocation for education. In Economic Times. Retrieved from -https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/industry/services/education/budget-2021-6-cut-in-allocation-for-education-sector/articleshow/80640500.cms

   


Everything related to commercialization of education and regulation of private schools has been removed. Absolute red line for Oxfam India.

 [SS2]Pl incorporate as appropriate – issues related to private schools/commercialisation are not a strong area for our team