On May 31st 2019, the Dr. Kasturirangan Committee submitted the draft National Education Policy (NEP) 2019 to the Ministry of Human Resource Development (MHRD). The draft, expected to lead up to the Policy, comes after this long hiatus in the sector that has undergone unprecedented changes since the last policy (1986/1992), especially since the introduction of the economic reforms of the 1990’s.
The draft covers around 24 diverse themes and
a plethora of issues related to school education, higher education, technical
education and adult education. The challenges and requirements for each sector
within education differ immensely and hence require focused attention. Financing
is one of those areas which has been accorded substantive attention in the
policy document. Although, there is no separate chapter on financing on
education, but it has come as an addendum.
The policy has acknowledged the need for
higher investment in education and rightly envisioned that to reap maximum
benefits from this investment; financing should be largely from public sources.
In this regard, the policy recommended for increasing the overall public
expenditure (Centre and state) on education from current 10% to 20% in a
10-year period. At the same time, to supplement government spending on
education, the draft has suggested alternative avenues of investment through
Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) efforts and philanthropic initiatives by
individuals, corporations and communities.
Public resource mobilization through tax
collection is the backbone of financing education in India. Although a
progressive individual income tax system has been in place in India since 1922,
unfortunately only about one-third of total taxes in the country are generated
from direct taxes nearly two-thirds, of the total tax revenue comes from
indirect taxes. Indirect taxes, especially when imposed mainly on mass consumer
goods, widen the income gap and aggravate inequality in the society. India is also the country with one of the
lowest overall tax-GDP ratios (about 17% in 2016-17) among the G20 and BRICS
countries.
In the present economic scenario, the direct
tax collection has seen a growth rate of merely 5 % so far this year, which is
much lower than what was projected. Government
is also anticipating a shortfall in GST collection. Along with this, the recent
announcements on cutting corporate tax rates could end up in a massive fiscal
slippage of the economy. Undoubtedly, this is going to affect the government
financing of social sectors, particularly, education. Unfortunately, the
recommendations on financing in the draft NEP appears as a delink from
country’s fiscal policy.
Objective
of the consultation
Given the significance of the new education
policy, a discussion on the recommendations on ‘financing’ in the draft NEP calls
for an in-depth brainstorming, especially in the current economic scenario. The
proposed consultation by RTE forum and CBGA aims to engage in a critical
discussion on the draft with a particular focus on fiscal implication of draft
NEP in relation to school education. The consultation would like to look at
some specific questions like whether the recommended tenure of 10 years to
increase expenditure by 10 % for education is too long; what should be the
resource sharing pattern between Centre and States to implement suggested
reforms in the policy. This discussion is more pertinent in the context of
recommendations by 14th Finance Commission and TOR presented by 15th
Finance Commission. It is also worth a debate and discussion around how
ambitious is the recommendations of financing education through Cess, CSR and
philanthropic activities as envisioned in the draft.
No comments:
Post a Comment